Post by herosrest on Jul 2, 2022 11:39:19 GMT
I hesitated to respond to the Mississipi 'issue' quip thrown into discussion elsewhere but have turned my mind to this fundamental matter.
The Mississipi Snip.
In reviewing the USSC pro-life Judgement www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61928898?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA as (of course) presented to us in UK; it seems to me that an inevitable but unfortunate failure of logic has been applied.
Mississippi's ban on abortion after 15 weeks was challenged and the ruling in favour of the state effectively ends constitutional right to an abortion. A very unfortunate and tediously narrow Judgement which has completely missed or avoided preventing the cause of pregnancy. Jackson Women's Health Organization's legal team have undertaken a terribly sloppy and deeply flawed representation of their client and the wider imperatives.
Women do not become pregnant in isolation, there is no immaculate conception, and the partners (effectively the male population) carry equal responsibility which is ignored by Court. Therefore, the only logical conclusion should have been a ruling preventing ejaculation. That should be clinically enforced.
There is no legal right to conceive. Conception led to terminations. Termination is illegal. Conception should cease.
The Mississipi Snip.
In reviewing the USSC pro-life Judgement www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-61928898?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA as (of course) presented to us in UK; it seems to me that an inevitable but unfortunate failure of logic has been applied.
Mississippi's ban on abortion after 15 weeks was challenged and the ruling in favour of the state effectively ends constitutional right to an abortion. A very unfortunate and tediously narrow Judgement which has completely missed or avoided preventing the cause of pregnancy. Jackson Women's Health Organization's legal team have undertaken a terribly sloppy and deeply flawed representation of their client and the wider imperatives.
Women do not become pregnant in isolation, there is no immaculate conception, and the partners (effectively the male population) carry equal responsibility which is ignored by Court. Therefore, the only logical conclusion should have been a ruling preventing ejaculation. That should be clinically enforced.
There is no legal right to conceive. Conception led to terminations. Termination is illegal. Conception should cease.
